About Dr. Gourmet

My name is Timothy Harlan and I am both a physician and a chef. This blog is a general collection of information and random ideas on eating great food and eating healthy.

You can find out more at the Dr. Gourmet web site. Eat well, eat healthy, enjoy life!

Categories

“Science” in The Interest of Industry.

I love stories like these.  They are all over the web.  They are research studies that are funded by a particular company to make the public think that their product is somehow healthier (in this case flavanoids = good and chocolate = flavanoids therefore chocolate = good).

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/172098.php

Look, I like chocolate and it’s not really bad for you unless you eat a lot of it (which most Americans do at about 12 pounds a year).  It’s statements like this that make folks think eating chocolate is good for you:

“Being able to fully measure and communicate the levels of flavanol antioxidants in products is increasingly important for studying the potential health benefits of cocoa and chocolate and providing information to consumers,” said Debra Miller, Ph.D., Director of Nutrition at The Hershey Company.

It’s OK to study this but until you really prove something there’s no reason to do a press release (unless, of course, you are the publicist who’s job it is to send out press releases).

Dr. Miller, when you can show through research that risk of eating 12 pounds of chocolate a year is outweighed by the benefits of the flavanoids in that 12 pounds of chocolate that’s something to report on.

Oh yeah, am I the only one who thinks that the title Director of Nutrition at The Hershey Company is the best oxymoron?

Dr. Gourmet

Eat well, eat healthy, enjoy life!

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • MSN Reporter
  • NewsVine
  • FriendFeed
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • That's hysterical. Sandra Boynton as Hershey chocolate researcher!
  • margalite
    The sad thing is that when people eat 60% or 70% (or higher?) "healthy" cacao content bars, they are exposed to the natural bitterness of chocolate, and likely will eschew them regardless of bioflavanoid content.

    People use chocolate for the endorphin kick and for their sweetness addictions and possibly because they are deficient in magnesium.

    I agree with you that the companies just get on the bandwagon for their own motives.

    I wonder if adding agave, as a low glycemic sweetener, and using no other sugar, milk etc., could give us the best of both worlds using a 70% cacao content bar. What do you think?
  • bertinricewa
    Dr. Miller probably used this in her research:

    http://tinyurl.com/BoyntonChoc...

    Title: Chocolate: The Consuming Passion
    Written, Illustrated, and Overresearched by Sandra Boynton

    One of the many results of the research is a nutritional table showing how chocolate is better for you than a list of items. Key to making the claims, of course, is the serving size (e.g., a couple of carrot curls vs a large piece of chocolate).

    Great gift, but a bit too skewed for a nutritional reference
blog comments powered by Disqus